Distributed Maximum Matching in Bounded Degree Graphs

We present deterministic distributed algorithms for computing approximate maximum cardinality matchings and approximate maximum weight matchings. Our algorithm for the unweighted case computes a matching whose size is at least (1-\eps) times the optimal in \Delta^{O(1/\eps)} + O\left(\frac{1}{\eps^2}\right) \cdot\log^*(n) rounds where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and $\Delta$ is the maximum degree. Our algorithm for the edge-weighted case computes a matching whose weight is at least (1-\eps) times the optimal in \log(\min\{1/\wmin,n/\eps\})^{O(1/\eps)}\cdot(\Delta^{O(1/\eps)}+\log^*(n)) rounds for edge-weights in [\wmin,1]. The best previous algorithms for both the unweighted case and the weighted case are by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie~(SPAA 2008). For the unweighted case they give a randomized (1-\eps)-approximation algorithm that runs in O((\log(n)) /\eps^3) rounds. For the weighted case they give a randomized (1/2-\eps)-approximation algorithm that runs in O(\log(\eps^{-1}) \cdot \log(n)) rounds. Hence, our results improve on the previous ones when the parameters $\Delta$, \eps and \wmin are constants (where we reduce the number of runs from $O(\log(n))$ to $O(\log^*(n))$), and more generally when $\Delta$, 1/\eps and 1/\wmin are sufficiently slowly increasing functions of $n$. Moreover, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1402.379

Best of Two Local Models: Local Centralized and Local Distributed Algorithms

We consider two models of computation: centralized local algorithms and local distributed algorithms. Algorithms in one model are adapted to the other model to obtain improved algorithms. Distributed vertex coloring is employed to design improved centralized local algorithms for: maximal independent set, maximal matching, and an approximation scheme for maximum (weighted) matching over bounded degree graphs. The improvement is threefold: the algorithms are deterministic, stateless, and the number of probes grows polynomially in $\log^* n$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph. The recursive centralized local improvement technique by Nguyen and Onak~\cite{onak2008} is employed to obtain an improved distributed approximation scheme for maximum (weighted) matching. The improvement is twofold: we reduce the number of rounds from $O(\log n)$ to $O(\log^*n)$ for a wide range of instances and, our algorithms are deterministic rather than randomized

Faster and Simpler Distributed Algorithms for Testing and Correcting Graph Properties in the CONGEST-Model

In this paper we present distributed testing algorithms of graph properties in the CONGEST-model [Censor-Hillel et al. 2016]. We present one-sided error testing algorithms in the general graph model. We first describe a general procedure for converting $\epsilon$-testers with a number of rounds $f(D)$, where $D$ denotes the diameter of the graph, to $O((\log n)/\epsilon)+f((\log n)/\epsilon)$ rounds, where $n$ is the number of processors of the network. We then apply this procedure to obtain an optimal tester, in terms of $n$, for testing bipartiteness, whose round complexity is $O(\epsilon^{-1}\log n)$, which improves over the $poly(\epsilon^{-1} \log n)$-round algorithm by Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016). Moreover, for cycle-freeness, we obtain a \emph{corrector} of the graph that locally corrects the graph so that the corrected graph is acyclic. Note that, unlike a tester, a corrector needs to mend the graph in many places in the case that the graph is far from having the property. In the second part of the paper we design algorithms for testing whether the network is $H$-free for any connected $H$ of size up to four with round complexity of $O(\epsilon^{-1})$. This improves over the $O(\epsilon^{-2})$-round algorithms for testing triangle freeness by Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016) and for testing excluded graphs of size $4$ by Fraigniaud et al. (DISC 2016). In the last part we generalize the global tester by Iwama and Yoshida (ITCS 2014) of testing $k$-path freeness to testing the exclusion of any tree of order $k$. We then show how to simulate this algorithm in the CONGEST-model in $O(k^{k^2+1}\cdot\epsilon^{-k})$ rounds